The Undercover Mission of the New International Spy Museum

International Spy Museum
The International Spy Museum, Washington D.C. (Credit: Jefferson Morley

The new International Spy Museum in Washington D.C. is, not surprisingly, an institution in disguise, an undercover operation executed in plain sight.

The museum’s beveled glassy front is more stylish than its neighbors–the bland façade of the Post Office to the west, the neo-expressionist face of the General Services Administration to the north. Yet the Spy Museum is not out of place. In the soulless bureaucratic landscape of L’Enfant Plaza, a temple of public service propaganda fits right in.

Inside the revolving doors, the first thing you see is James Bond’s tricked out Aston-Martin approaching from the left, while the original U.S. drone, buzzes overhead. This entertaining emporium of fact and fiction tells a cover story, albeit one endowed with “plausible deniability.” It covers the disturbing realities of secret intelligence agencies with the reassuring message: we protect you. Maybe it’s true, you think.

The museum’s Board of Directors, displayed next to the elevators, skews toward former intelligence barons with a sprinkling of Hollywood and Capitol Hill.  The names of James Clapper and Michael Hayden, George Tenet, and Robert Gates appear, along with Robert DeNiro, director of the excellent CIA movie, The Good Shepherd, Matthew Rhys the intense star of The Americans, and Joe Weisberg, the former CIA officer who created The Americans. There’s a conservative Republican congressman, Will Hurd, a liberal former Democratic governor, James Blanchard, and an insider columnist, David Ignatius. Message: you’re in for a good time with good company.

The cheerful docent compelled me to take a black and yellow badge and submit to the interactive experience of taking a cover name and identity. As this game didn’t seem to be optional, I assumed the identity of “Ari Lee,”  a photographer from Mexico City, in search of a terrorist group in Indonesia. In the darkened elevator I briefly wondered if I, as Ari Lee, was supposed to be a man or a woman. Subliminal message: CIA is gender fluid.

Espionage in Neon.

The lavish interactive exhibits on the fourth and five floors, don’t scant the deception and violence inherent in secret intelligence work. They presents them on a human scale factually, fictionally, and, above all, emotionally. Intelligence work, proclaim a banner, is all about Loyalty, Risk, Seduction, Cunning, Deception, and Trust.

The installation on Risk stars Morten Storm, an Danish jihadist turned undercover informant. The installation on Deception celebrates Vladimir Alekseenko, a Russian “master of technical countermeasures”  in the 1930s. They seem to be admirable people.

Do the high school kids passing through have a “need to know” that Strong helped locate Anwar Awlaki, a jihadist preacher and American citizen, who was tried and convicted by a secret process and executed in a drone strike ordered by President Obama in 2015?  Do they need to know that Alekseenko loyally served the Soviet secret service, the NKVD, which enforced Stalinist orthodoxy with firing squads, famine, and the Gulag? They won’t learn it here.

It is more entertaining to focus on the gadgets and their stories. In 1945, a group of Russian students gave the U.S. embassy in Moscow a hand-carved wooden emblem of the United States. It took nine years for U.S. intelligence officers to realize their Soviet counterparts had stashed a directional microphone inside the emblem and were listening to their every conversation. Uncoded Message: intelligence officers can be kind of dumb.

Mata Hari, cinematic spy

The exhibits combine the frisson of fear with the delight of the silver screen. Here’s the real pick axe that Stalin’s agents used to shatter the skull of rival Leon Trotsky in Mexico City in 1940. There are the actual steel teeth displayed the lumbering villainous giant in “Goldfinger,” the James Bond flick. Naturally, the patrons tend to prefer the fictional. The wing devoted to spy movies was jammed with people.

The blending of fact and fiction can amount to a falsification of history. The real-life Allen Dulles, CIA director who destroyed democratic governments in Iran and Guatemala–crimes we still pay for–gets the same treatment, and number of words, as the fictional Emma Peel, the svelte, kickass agent, of the 1960s TV show “The Avengers.”

Another exhibit examines the tradeoffs between security and liberty, between secrecy and oversight. NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake talks about how he tried and failed to go through official channels to expose massive contracting abuses. Edward Snowden gets short shrift but the ideal of accountability does not. Message Deciphered: the intelligence community knows it has a credibility problem.

Stress position.

Another room examines the issue of torture with ostensible candor. It features a replica of the box, smaller than a coffin, into which al Qaeda operation Abu Zubeydah was stuffed to make him talk. U.S. officials thought he was high-ranking al-Qaeda operative who planned operations. He wasn’t. He was the equivalent of a clerk who knew little. He was tortured anyway. “Comfortable?” asks the sign on the box. Subliminal message: Terror suspects don’t deserve comfort.

On a big screen, the issue is debated with a show of balance.  Law professor Alberto Mora argues that torture is repugnant to the American creed of inalienable rights. Jose Rodriguez, former CIA operations chief and mentor to director Gina Haspel, counters that torture saved lives. “Some day you will learn the whole story,” he says. In fact, the Senate Intelligence Committee reviewed the classified record in 2014 and found no examples of torture preventing a terror attack. The CIA suppressed the full report.

The exhibit ends with an opportunity to vote on the question, “Would you be willing to have the U.S. government torture suspected terrorist if they knew about future attacks?” Torture wins, 63-37 percent. Unclassified Message: Torture is a policy option.

Enhanced Interrogation Technique

My favorite exhibit explains the Cuban missile crisis of October 1962 via personality profiles of President John F. Kennedy (“detached” and “aristocratic”) and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev (“shrewd’ and “self-made”). The usual Cold War frame of the crisis–communist aggression deterred by manly Americans–is jettisoned in favor pictures and documents tell the heart-stopping story about how the these two very different leaders managed, at the very last minute, to avoid nuclear war. This is the CIA at its best. Open Source Message: good intelligence can save the world.

And, so in its fun and sometimes fair-minded way the Spy Museum guides you to its favored conclusions and, not coincidentally, to an enormous gift shop featuring “Deny It All” t-shirts, Mata Hari postcards, handcuff necklaces, and excellent array of books. Message as advertisement: Secret intelligence is a blessing so buy a CIA shot glass for Uncle Ernie.

The Spy Museum is, in sum, a monument to the normalization of secret intelligence in a democratic republic. Like the CIA’s Twitter and Instagram accounts and emergence of former spy chiefs as cable news talking heads, the Spy Museum seeks to persuade you that the CIA and NSA are friendly neighbors and public servants, who might occasionally have to do bad stuff so you can sleep safely at night. It’s a comforting thought, except on those occasions when it’s not true.

In its ingenious way, the Spy Museum whitewashes the sinister record of the CIA not just for the history books but for public memory. Generously but astutely, the museum downplays similar crimes committed the KGB and other rival services. Educationally speaking, the Spy Museum offers a child’s view of history, an upbeat narrative of benevolent adults who vanquish villains as a better future beckons. In the vernacular of intelligence, the museum “sanitizes” the reality of secret intelligence agencies, the better to perpetuate their reign right here in Washington.

Jose Rodriguez, torture advocate. (Credit Jefferson Morley)

As I left with a bag full of tchotchkes in hand, I wondered what Harry Truman would think.

 In September 1945, Truman abolished the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), America’s first secret intelligence agency, saying he didn’t want to create an “American Gestapo.” The Gestapo, of course, was the Nazi’s secret intelligence agency. A secret intelligence agency in peacetime, Truman believed, was inherently a threat to American democracy.

Two years later, Truman reversed himself. In July 1947 he signed the National Security Act which created the CIA and installed it in temporary buildings on front of the Lincoln Memorial. In his signing statement, Truman again warned against an “American Gestapo” but accepted a secret intelligence agency as a necessary evil.

Sixteen years after that, Truman reversed himself again. In December 1963, a month after President Kennedy was ambushed, Truman called for the abolition of the clandestine service. He privately believed the CIA threat to American democracy might have become terribly real in Dallas, and he wanted to eliminate it. He was ignored.

I think Truman would see the Spy Museum for what it is: a domestic influence operation designed to quell American ambivalence about a law-breaking agency with secret powers. I think he would say it succeeds all too well.

Gitmo Testimony Sheds Light on $81 Million CIA Contract for Waterboarding Duo

Adam Driver in THE REPORT
Adam Driver plays Dan Jones, a dogged Senate investigator of CIA torture program.

The continuing testimony of James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, architects of the CIA’s torture program, at a military tribunal in Guantanamo sheds new light on the business side of “enhanced interrogation.”

The duo make an appearance in their private jet in The Report, the movie sabout the Senate Intelligence Committee investigation of the CIA torture program, starring Adam Driver and Annette Bening.

On the stand, Mitchell answered questions about how he and his partner got a no-bid contract for their work. 

From the Washington Examiner reporter at the trial:

The duo formed a Spokane, Washington-based consulting firm, Mitchell, Jessen, and Associates, in 2005. Between then and 2009, their company received $81 million out of a possible $180 million contract as they assisted the CIA’s rendition and detention group. The agency also gave Mitchell and Jessen an indemnification agreement protecting them from legal liability. As of 2014, the government had paid out $1 million — with an additional, undisclosed settlement paid in 2017 to representatives for three former detainees through an ACLU lawsuit.

Mitchell claimed that the company “existed prior to them coming up with the contract.” He said that it was “originally formed because [he] wanted to continue to provide continued medical education for war fighters” and that it wasn’t created to conduct interrogations.

“I was told that it was an open bid contract and that our proposal would be considered with other proposals,” Mitchell testified about the payment. “Later, I was told it was a sole source contract.”

“It was revenue, not profit,” Mitchell said of the $81 million, claiming the vast majority of the funds went to pay for his more than 100 employees. All of his company’s interrogators were former CIA officers, he said. “The CIA would tell us what the qualifications had to be, and the qualifications were that you had to have worked the job before.”

Source: ‘Approved by the CIA’: Gitmo testimony sheds light on $81 million contract for black site interrogations

The Report’s Daniel Jones: How the CIA Manipulates Presidents

美国:中央情报局 (CIA)
Adam Driver as Dan Jones, dogged investigator of the CIA’s torture program.

Dan Jones (portrayed by Adam Driver in the riveting movie, The Report) recently spoke to Jeremy Scahill about the relationship of the CIA to the presidency. It’s not a theme that is really spelled out in the movie, which focuses on the politics of torture, but what Jones says is key to understanding the realities of Washington power during the Bush, Obama and Trump presidencies.

Jones makes a point that may be hard for citizens and journalists to comprehend. The CIA was created in 1947 to serve as the instrument of the commander in chief, to wield the hidden hand of U.S. power. In the 21st century, Jones notes, the presidency became the instrument of the agency’s designs.

The conventional Washington view that is President George W. Bush, led by vizier Dick Cheney, ordered the CIA start torturing suspected terrorists in order to prevent another 9/11 attack. That’s not what happened, Jones said.

So, while we were doing this investigation, one of the stories from the agency was, “Hey, we’re just following orders,” right? “This isn’t our program. This is the Bush-Cheney program. This is Obama’s program. This is America’s program.” And we had 6.3 million pages of records and they really wanted to push this narrative that they were just following orders, good soldiers. And it just isn’t in the records. And we asked the agency, if this is the case, find us the record somewhere. Where’s the email? There’s not even an email discussion among people saying we were with Cheney today and he told us we have to do this. It does not exist. We asked for it. It was in the CIA’s interest to produce it because that was part of their narrative which is we’re just following orders. What the records indicate is that this was a CIA program foisted upon the Bush-Cheney White House, not the other way around.

As an independent observer who had high security clearances and extraordinary access to CIA records, Jones knows what he’s talking about.

It’s really an incredible story and that’s what I always thought the takeaway of this entire report would be. There’s no doubt that torture is terrible. It’s far more brutal than the CIA had suggested. It’s obviously, it was grossly ineffective and resulted in false answers. But I thought the larger takeaway was here’s the CIA systematically misleading its leadership, its political leadership, over multiple administrations — Bush and Cheney, and then later on with Obama with the operation that led to bin Laden’s death.

Source: We Tortured Some Folks: The Report’s Daniel Jones on the Ongoing Fight to Hold the CIA Accountable

Where Trump and the Deep State Agencies Agree

John Brennan
Trump and Haspel
Gina Haspel’s swearing-in ceremony (Credit: Evan Vucci/AP)

It’s a paradox of impeachment politics.

As President Trump faces charges of high crimes and misdemeanors in Congress, he denounces the alleged “deep state” cabal out to get him. His campaign is running a powerful online ad about the supposed conspiracy. It features footage of former CIA director John Brennan and former acting director John McLaughlin at a recent event in Washington. I had a memorable encounter with Brennan at the event, so I know what he’s talking about. No one has demonized the CIA leadership more effectively than Trump.

Yet on the CIA’s most controversial policy–torture–the president has backed the agency’s leadership (including Brennan and McLaughlin) to the hilt. By way of background, in October 2017 Trump caved to CIA demands on a more symbolic question–JFK assassination files. The president approved continuing JFK secrecy.  On two issues where the CIA was vulnerable, Trump actually protected the deep state agency that he supposedly scorns. He and CIA director Gina Haspel share at least one belief: torture is a policy option that any commander in chief should consider without undue moralism.

I don’t believe in Trump’s concept of a “deep state.” It’s simplistic and riddled with factual falsehoods. I think the CIA is a political faction that wants to defeat the president for reasons of its own. Trump may approve of torture. The agency hands want to get rid of him anyway.

Trump and the CIA

Scott Roehm of the Open Society Foundation points out that Don McGahn, Trump’s White House counsel, was so disturbed by Gina Haspel’s torture resume that he suggested Trump to withdraw her nomination.

According to the report, U.S. President Donald Trump not only disagreed but “actually liked this aspect of Haspel’s resume.” He thought her support for torture “was an asset, not a liability.” In fact, Trump apparently asked Haspel whether waterboarding “works,” and she replied she was “100 percent sure” that it did.     

Of course, the president, who campaigned in 2016 as an avowed supporter of torture, could have once again been describing a conversation in the way he wanted to have had it, rather than how actually transpired. Or perhaps Haspel indeed said something along the lines of what she’s reported to have said. Either way, for anyone who needed a reminder of how much work remains to be done to close this dark chapter of U.S. history, this anecdote should suffice.

The story of the CIA’s torture regime is well told in the new movie The Report, starring Adam Driver. (If we’re talking Oscar nominations, I think  Driver deserves one. Then again I have an incorrigible weakness for that oxymoronic genre, the bureaucratic thriller, a snooze to many. )

In reality, Trump’s approval of the torture program (like his deal on JFK secrecy) suggests his demonization of the so-called “deep state” is opportunistic. The president, based on past performance, will reach tacit understandings with the secret agencies when it suits their mutual needs.

And, as he struggles to save his presidency,  he may do so again. 

Source: An Overdue Reckoning with U.S. Torture – Open Society Foundations

Sidney Gottlieb: Mastermind of MKULTRA

Sidney Gottlieb
MKULTRA imagery

“He was creator and destroyer, an outlaw who served power, a gentle hearted torturer… above all he was an instrument of history,” writes Stephen Kinzer of Sidney Gottlieb, chief of the CIA’s mind control program notoriously known as MKULTRA.

The revelations of Kinzer’s fascinating and disturbing biography, Poisoner in Chief, are unsettling enough. Kinzer, former New York Times reporter turned Brown University historian, makes a convincing case that the genial Gottlieb was a countercultural war criminal. The hundred-plus MKULTRA experiments conducted from 1952 to 1970–“sub-projects” Gottlieb called them–destroyed lives of hundreds, perhaps thousands of unwitting people, in service of the CIA’s futile search for ways to definitively control human behavior. And after inflicting torture on countless persons Gottlieb retired to a life of good works on an ecofriendly goat farm in rural Virginia. 

The idea that Sidney Gottlieb was also an “instrument of history” is more unsettling yet and elevates Poisoner in Chief from fascinating investigative expose to potent politico-cultural history. As chief of the CIA’s Technical Services Division, Gottlieb never lost his belief that LSD might be harnessed for purposes of espionage and covert action. 

It was a peculiar faith. Lysergic acid was a known chemical compound found in ergot, a bacteria that grows on bread, known to cause hallucinations if ingested. A Swiss chemist developed a variation that he called LSD-25 that had extraordinary effects, even in tiny doses. It induced hallucinations, hysteria, confessions, confusion, ecstatic insight, and deep depression. After taking LSD himself, Gottlieb became fascinated with its effects and became certain it could be used to advance the CIA’s mission. So he sanctioned the distribution of LSD to scientists around the country, never imagining the cultural consequences.

“First, [LSD] leaked into elite society,” Kinzer writes, “then it spread to students who took it in CIA-sponsored experiments. Finally it exploded into the American counterculture, fueling a movement dedicated to destroying much of what the CIA defended and held dear.” (186). 

MKULTRA, or something like it, might well have happened if Gottlieb had never been born. But his affable amoral mind shaped its direction and sharpened its focus on LSD. As history’s instrument, he embodied weirdness.

With the Nazi Scientists

Sidney Gottlieb
Sidney Gottlieb, MKULTRA Mastermind (Credit: CIA)

Gottlieb’s story begins at James Monroe High School in the Bronx in the 1930s. The son of Hungarian Jewish immigrants, Gottlieb excelled in the sciences at City College. He went on to earn advanced degrees in chemistry from the University of Wisconsin and California Institute of Technology. During World War II, he married and worked as a scientist for various government agencies. In 1951, his mentor at Wisconsin recommended him for a job at the newly-created CIA. 

Gottlieb’s professional rise was powered by the imperatives of the Cold War. In the minds of U.S. policymakers and officials, fear of the Soviet Union and allied communist parties justified virtually any course of secret action. Kinzer weaves in the story of Operation Paperclip, a CIA program to tap the expertise of former Nazi scientists. Just a few years earlier at Nuremberg, the U.S. prosecutors had convicted and hanged seven German scientists who had experimented on human subjects. Now Gottlieb was chatting them up as paid consultants.

By combining psychology and chemistry, Gottlieb sought to use science to make Americans safe from the threat of communism. MKULTRA, Kinzer notes, grew out of “a conviction that became an article of faith at the CIA: there is a way to control the human mind, and it can be found, the prize will be nothing less than global mastery.” 

Sidney Gottlieb shared this faith with three of the most powerful CIA men: counterintelligence chief James Angleton, operations chief Frank Wisner, and deputy operations chief Richard Helms. Kinzer shows how Helms enabled Gottlieb’s crimes for two decades and then destroyed most of the paper trail

James Angleton
James Angleton, CIA counterintelligence chief and MKULTRA founding father.

Angleton’s blessing was no less important. As counterintelligence chief and assassination consultant, Angleton assessed the bonafides of defectors and the techniques for killing people. He was involved in the search for truth serum and helped put together the MKULTRA network in 1952 and took LSD himself on at least one occasion. Working in the landscape he called a “wilderness of mirrors,” Angleton often relied on MKULTRA techniques. Soviet defector Yuri Nosenko, held in a CIA black site from 1964 to 1969, said that he was dosed with LSD while in Angleton’s custody. 

‘Jumped or Fell’

The legacy of CIA hubris was lethal from the very start. In 1951, a group of CIA scientists, led by Gottlieb, flew to Tokyo where they oversaw the interrogation of four suspected Russian spies.  The men were injected with stimulants and depressives, and then subjected to harsh interrogation. After they confessed to spying, “They were taken out into Tokyo Bay, shot, and dumped overboard,” Kinzer writes.

In using captive populations for espionage experiments, the mind control program served as a model for future CIA operations throughout the Cold War.

“Gottlieb’s work contributed decisively to the development of techniques that Americans and their allies used at detention centers in Vietnam, Latin America, Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo Bay and secret prison’s around the world,” Kinzer writes.

From the beginning, “interrogators worked without any outside supervision. This set a precedent that marked a breakthrough for the CIA. By opening prisons, the Agency established its right not only to detain and imprison people in other countries but to interrogate them harshly while they were in custody without regard for U.S law.”

Gottlieb’s role in the violent demise of his colleague, Frank Olson, is chilling.

Frank Olson
From Wormwood, Erroll Morris’s docu-drama about MKULTRA. (Credit: Netflix)

Olson, a CIA chemist who worked on MKULTRA projects, fell to his death from the upper floors of New York hotel in November 1953, a tragedy dissected in atmospheric detail in Errol Morris’s 2017 docudrama Wormwood.  

With the help of Olson’s son, Kinzer dismantles the CIA’s cover story that Olson had a bad reaction to an LSD trip two weeks before and “jumped or fell” through the closed window of a hotel room overlooking Penn Station. In fact, Olson had witnessed brutal interrogation and disposal of human subjects in MKULTRA sites and wanted to quit his job. After Kinzer’s account, there can be little doubt Olson was killed by CIA operatives, not that anyone in Langley cares to fess up. The cover-up launched by Gottlieb and his masters is still in effect today.

Follow the Money

Kinzer mines the one batch of MKULTRA documents that escaped the CIA’s shredding machines: the accountants’ files. While Helms and Gottlieb shredded the records of the MKULTRA experiments, they overlooked the financial records. Author John Marks obtained them via the Freedom of Information Act in the 1980s, a story he tells in his seminal book “The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.” These files remain one of the best sources for understanding the scale of MKULTRA.

(And the story is still emerging, A new batch of declassified MKULTRA records was just released by Black Vault.)

Kinzer follows the CIA’s money to 40-plus different universities, hospitals, clinics, and prisons where the experiments were conducted, including a castle in Germany, a brothel in Greenwich Village, an addiction treatment center in Kentucky, McGill University in Toronto, and a Veteran’s Administration hospital in Menlo Park, California.

The casual and cruel abuse of human life was endemic in MKULTRA research. In Kentucky, recovering drug addicts, most of them African-American, were given LSD up to four times a day for 77 straight days in the 1960s. Ewen Cameron, a Canadian doctor, experimented with wiping of hundreds of his patient’s memories. The Canadian government later paid $100,000 to 77 of Cameron’s patients or their descendants (266). In Atlanta, imprisoned gangster Whitey Bulger was dosed with seven other convicts. “We experienced horrible periods of living nightmares, and even blood coming out of the walls. Guys turning into skeletons in front of me,” Bulger wrote in his memoir.   “Gottlieb,” Kinzer observes acidly, “was not a sadist but he might as well have been.”

Poisoner in Chief is also a story about the failure of oversight.  The abuses might have been caught, checked or corrected if anyone had known about them. In 1956, Senator Mike Mansfield, a Montana Democrat, proposed the creation of a Senate Intelligence Committee to oversee the work of the CIA. He had the support of 37 senators. The agency lobbied a dozen senators into withdrawing support for Mansfield’s bill and it was defeated by a wide margin. “The CIA was safe,” Kinzer writes. “So was MKULTRA.” The idea of congressional oversight would not be revived for another 20 years.  

But even after the exposure of MKULTRA and the admission of Olson’s “suicide” in 1975, its influence was not dispelled. The creation of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees in 1976 and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act courts in 1978 did not prevent the son of MKULTRA– the post 9/11 torture regime that was not abolished until 2009.

“Congressional oversight of intelligence agencies has not led to deep changes in the ways those agencies work,” Kinzer notes. When my son asked me recently, “Don’t you think there’s still some version of MKULTRA today?” I said there’s no evidence. But who knows?

Today, MKULTRA is a household term, a template for Hollywood thrillers like the Bourne triology, catnip for novelists, and a universal signifier of conspiratorial manipulation. When the FBI identified fringe conspiracy theories as a domestic terrorist threat for the first time last month, the Bureau also observed that one factor driving the intensity of the threat is “the uncovering of real conspiracies or cover-ups involving illegal, harmful, or unconstitutional activities.”  MKULTRA was one of the original real conspiracies of the American national security state.

It amounted to a CIA sanctioned crime wave that lasted two decades. Its reliance on LSD fueled the countercultural revolution of the 1960s. It’s bland treachery sustains conspiracy theories about the El Paso mass shooting today. Understanding Sidney Gottlieb, Kinzer concludes, “is a deeply disturbing way of understanding ourselves.”