JFK Confronted Israel Over Its Secret Nuclear Program 

Avner Cohen and Bill Burr are two of the best historians on the secret Israeli nuclear program of the 1960s, which made Israel the Middle East’s first nuclear power.

Seal of Mossad – Israeli Foreign Intelligence

It almost didn’t happen. In a brief for the non-profit National Security Archives and an article for Haaretz.com,Cohen and Burr explain that the program was almost shut down. President John F. Kennedy confronted Israeli leaders in the summer of 1963 demanding stringent inspections.

Throughout the spring and summer of 1963, the leaders of the United States and Israel – President John F. Kennedy and Prime Ministers David Ben-Gurion and Levi Eshkol – were engaged in a high-stakes battle of wills over Israel’s nuclear program.

The Israelis resisted because they were determined to secretly build their own nuclear arsenal while pretending otherwise to the Americans and the international community. Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963 and President Lyndon Johnson never pressed the issue.

As I recounted here last month, Mossad masterspy Rafi Eitan would go on to mastermind the theft of several hundred pounds of enriched uranium from a U.S. facility in the mid-1960s. With the fissile material in hand, Israel produced its first bomb in 1967 or 1968.

(I tell the story of the CIA’s perspective in the is power struggle in my book The Ghost: The Secret Life of CIA Spymaster James Jesus Angelton.)

Fifty years later, Israel is the region’s only nuclear power.

Source: How a standoff with the U.S. almost blew up Israel’s nuclear program – Israel News – Haaretz.com

4 Replies to “JFK Confronted Israel Over Its Secret Nuclear Program ”

  1. This information simply adds additional motive to why the CIA could allow the murder of a sitting U.S. president.

    To those of us with clarity of vision once you understsnd some of how the USAEC, United States Atomic Energy Commission worked and learn about the players there the ability so understand why Edward Teller, Lewis Strauss and Glenn Seaborg, just to name a few did their damnedest to rid themselves of a very clear minded Robert J. Oppenheimer.

    Oppie knew the superior destructive power of the thermo-nuclear atomic bomb. Teller’s lovingly named “Super”, he new it would be very easy for the Israelis to build once they mastered the plutonium powered and then the HEU 235 powered nukes. So they took a short cut by stealing or otherwise procuring the materials they needed U.S. restrictions be damned. The structures intended to prevent such a delivery or theft of such materials from a very dysfunctional USAEC failed as intended. Those at Manhattan Project had already lost control of many of the vital secrets they had learned in the pursuit of these weapons . See Klaus Fuchs.

    The story at IRmep.org is a revelation of how CIA in concert with the DOJ obstructed one attemptafter another by the FBI to intervene in the NUMEC Diversions is proof that CIA refused to honor the Edict handed down by JFK.

    The theft or unsanctioned diversion of these SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS, FISSILE MATERIAL THAT HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CLOSELY CONTROLLED WAS NO OVERSIGHT BY USAEC. Some there knew of this and these “HERO’S” were and are no such thing.

    Pat Tillman, now he might qualify and he was murdered by his own people also. Sound familiar.

    By the way Jeff go read https://whowhatwhy.org/2019/04/29/the-meuller-report-alfa-bank-and-the-deep-state/

    These D.S. types are doing it again and Peter Dale Scotts piece here is the closest thing I’ve seen to the correct narrative.

    Nothing else makes any sense.

  2. I have just finished the article by Haaretz and it is pretty much what I would expect. Not much actual substance is added to the story.

    This story has been the subject of white wash after white wash time and again as Pro Israeli interests tried to deny the veracity of JFK’s have viewed a very few of related documents. Haaretz should have provided unaltered copies of the all the documents they reference in the article. The notes are a nice touch but I’ll take what they have written here with a grain of salt.

    As I also expected I would find something tangible on which to hang my hat of criticism in the article. I found a couple. First is document 45. The revelation here is that this document has nothing to do with the question of whether or not Israel had received diverted Highly Enriched U-235 a material they wanted to use to build an explosive device with. This material is and was considered “Special Nuclear Material” and the number one reason for this is because it is fissionable material. The same is true of plutonium. These material will react by creating fissions simply if two quantities are brought in close enough proximity. The resulting event is called a “criticality”

    I doubt very seriously if JFK had been alive the Jan 1964 inspections would have been the same.

    #1 enriching Uraniun to 90 + % is desired for weapons grade material. This is no easily hidden process.

    #2 One major discovery during the early Manhattan Project was the realization that Neals Bohr made with respect to the production of plutonium. Irradiating slugs of high quality U-238 provided copious amounts of plutonium that resulted as a by product of the fissioning process, and that could then be chemically separated. Glenn Seaborg refined the process and then helped develop the production to scale to produce industrial amounts of the stuff industrial. Difficult dangerous stuff to handle.

    This stuff in not easy to understand and tougher to develop rational technical understanding of.

    #3 Highly enriched U235 is not nearly as toxic or dangerous to handle. One simply does not want to get to much of the stuff in one place at one time for fear of the very dangerous and toxic “Criticality event”.

    Which brings me to the Document 46 and note #9 referred to there. #9 reads: As the AEC preferred, [ed ?-> (WAS THIS the U.S.A.E.C or the international entity known as the IAEA ?) the inspectors were not connected with the official safeguards program: two of them Richard W. Cook and Ulysses M. Steabler, had been involved with reactor development, while a third, C. L. McClelland was on the staff of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.

    I’m not going to belabor the point here because quite frankly the idea that this was a boni fide inspection is killed the note 9.

    A short search will explain why the statement here lend more to the notion that something was definitely a miss with this story or the inspection.

    IAEA, the International Atomic Energy Agency on it’s wiki had a list of MISSIONS listed is safeguards = implementing safeguards to verify that nuclear energy is not used for weapons and . . promoting higher standards for nuclear safety.

    By 1974 the USAEC was under fire and for very good reasons. The agency was embarrassed when large amounts of HUE 235 were missing.

    I have to a con relate that story and the true version, it’s a doozy!

    The Haaretz story is a pig with lipstick. Baldersdash with respect to revealing what actually occurred at the time. Stauss and Teller at USAEC , they knew. Seaborg knew but Oppie he didn’t know. WHY?

    JJA might have known about the diversion maybe not. Either was he would have maintained he had no culpability. I will never believe he didn’t know and in fact I believe he made certain the diversion happened, he was Israels #1 man at CIA after all. And I have often observed CIA never accepts the existence of chance in their scenarios.

    John McCone was USAEC Chair July 1958- January 1961, he went from USAEC Chair
    to Director of CIA Nov 29 1961 and was there until April 28, 1965. How convenient. Certainly appears that this was an inside job with cover from CIA.

    The Israelis and French finalized their nuclear relationship in Oct 1957. Zalmon Shapiro starts his business plans for NUMEC about the same time.

    I could go to Jane Mayer’s “Dark Money” find addition connections but enough for now.

    A white wash is a white wash is a white was. We need the CIA dovuments before guys like Richard Helms and Bill Barr destroy all the evidence. If they haven’t already.

    Thanks Jeff!

  3. JFK’S conviction second line second paragraph I some how managd to omit the word conviction.

  4. Not my day I guess. JFK’s conviction. I have viewed a very few documents from the GWU National Security Archives, what I was there left little doubt about just how committed JFK was to getting to the bottom of Israels nuke program.

    Jeeze I’ve screwed this up enough I’m done for the evening.

    Thanks for the patience!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Created by Unfiltered.Media